SIM 422 American Sentinel Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Discussion
Activity 2
Evaluating a Quantitative Research Study
Examine the study- Harris, M. F., Chan, B. C., Laws, R. A., Williams, A. M., Davies, G. P., Jayasinghe, U. W., … Milat, A. (2013). The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial). BMC Public Health, 13(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-375
In this assessment, you will evaluate the study according to research design methods, procedures and study results, for example, see Evaluating a Quantitative Study LoBiondo-Wood,& Haber (2018).
Suggested Reading
Chapter 7 & 8 LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Astroth, K. S., & Chung, S. Y. (2018). Focusing on the fundamentals: Reading quantitative research with a critical eye. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(3), 283-287. Retrieved from http://americansentinel.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.americansentinel.idm.oclc.org/docview/2063390700?accountid=169658
Additional Instructions:
- All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
- Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.
- Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.
- Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.
- Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.
Submission Options:
Choose One: |
Instructions: |
|||||||||||||||
Paper |
|
|||||||||||||||
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation |
|
|||||||||||||||
Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation |
|
|||||||||||||||
Video Presentation |
|
|||||||||||||||
Table |
|
|||||||||||||||
Graphs or other illustrations |
|
|||||||||||||||
Poster |
|
|||||||||||||||
Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements. Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research Study Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate an understanding of the basic elements of the research process and models for applying evidence to clinical practice. Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2) Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex health care environments. QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice BSN Essential III
Evaluates research design of study using all of the components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates methods/procedu re, and results of the study using all of the components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Discusses the importance of research, how the study contributes to EBP and applicability of the specific study to clinical Practice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018) Evaluates research design of study using all of the components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates methods/procedu re, and results of the study using all of the components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Discusses the importance of research, how the study contributes to EBP and applicability of the specific study to clinical Practice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018) Evaluates research design of study using (75%) components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates methods/procedu res and results of the study using (75%) components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Discusses the importance of research and how the study may contribute to EBP in general but not how the specific study contributes to current clinical Practice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates research design of study using some (50% or less) components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates methods/procedu res and results of the study using some (50% or less) components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Provides simple definitions of research and evidence but does not delve into the relationship among research, evidence-based practice and improving Practice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018) Does not address section Does not address section Does not address section
|