Blog

 Week 4 – Researched Argumentative Essay – Final SubmissionIt is time to complete your final assignment for this course. Demonstrate your mastery over academic research, argumentative writing, appropriate grammar and style, and your understanding of rhetorical modes as you complete this final assignment.Final Paper Weight: 20%
Due Date: Sunday of Week 4Consider using the  Keiser OWL . Submit your paper to the OWL by Wednesday. You may also use your local campus Writing Studio.DIRECTIONSNow that you have created a thorough outline, you should continue to expand the outline into an essay format using proper APA style. Additionally, you will need to show competency in constructing a research-based argumentative piece of writing.  To meet that goal, you will need to meet the following requirements:

• Demonstrate critical thinking and critical analysis skills, including your use of a research based argumentation
• Write between 1,000 – 1,200 words
  • Papers that do not meet at least 1,000 words are subject to a pro-rated penalty. (i.e. submitting 800 words would result in a 20% loss of grade as 20% of the paper’s word requirements were not met)
  • No abstract is needed for your paper. However, an APA formatted cover page and reference list is required.
• Effectively organize your essay. Write a clear introduction, thesis statement, multiple body paragraphs supporting the thesis statement, a paragraph that develops a counterpoint, and a clear conclusion.
• Use at least four sources.
  • Using a source means quoting, paraphrasing, and/or summarizing it, including a citation each time it is being used.
  • Reference each source you use in your reference list.
  • You should use the following sources:
    • Three peer-reviewed academic journal sources from Keiser’s e-Library
    • At least one additional credible source, which may include the e-Library, or another reputable location
    • Additional sources are optional.
    • Contact your instructor if you are unsure as to whether a source will count towards the requirements.
  • If fewer than four sources are used, 10% may be deducted from your grade for each missing source (i.e. using only two sources would result in a 20% loss of grade)
• No block quotes should be included. Use integrated quotes only.
• Use 3rd person objective point of view only. Avoid 1st and 2nd person points of view.
• Use academic language and proper grammar and mechanics. Consider using the Online Writing Lab or your local campus Writing Studio prior to submitting this paper.

REQUIREMENTS

• You should use 7th edition APA (No abstract is needed for APA 7 student papers).
• You should not use more than 20% of outside material. To check how much you are using, see the OWL’s sample paper submission.
• You should not sue visuals (i.e. images, charts, graphs, etc.). Use written material only.
• Your paper is due by Sunday of Week 4 at 11:59 PM. Papers submitted after 11:59 PM on Sunday of Week 4 will not be graded without prior approval by the instructor.
• Only one submission is allowed. Contact your instructor if you have a problem.

APA ver 7 white paper on technology (AI) in war.
Write a White Paper which includes:

1. Introduction/Summary
2. History/Background and Context
3. Problem (Defined)
4. Discussion to relate point of view from sources used
5. Writer takes a position
6. Solution/s
7. Conclusion

Your individual paper will be 2-3 pages in length(not counting the Title and Reference Pages) using APA 7th Edition Format.  Ensure you review the rubric grading criteria in depth to gain an understanding on how your paper will be graded.
need the assertion thesis and outline by Sunday.
Rough draft by Wednesday 7 April and final paper by 10th

                                       Week 3: Building Trust
Dwight thinks that new managers must know how to create and maintain trust with their employees. He views communication as a major component of establishing trusting relationships. Dwight has set up two real situations that he wants his new hires to evaluate and comment upon in a short three-minute video presentation to the group.  
Skill #2: Build trust in individual relationships both locally and at a distance.
In the recent meeting with the new managers, Dwight wanted to emphasize the importance of communication in leading. Dwight reported a recent occurrence in the production department just the other day. Sally Hill was sitting alone at the lunch table when Dwight passed by. Saying hello and getting an unusually quiet reply Dwight stopped to ask if things were alright. Sally said fine but did not look fine. He wondered if something was wrong. Sally, who runs the conveyor belts on the production line, has been on the job since EC began and is very good at her job.
Dwight was right. Things were not good for her on the production line. She was sitting at the lunch counter rather than go back to the floor and her job. It seems that Sally’s new floor supervisor has decided to implement a production efficiency study so that he could measure her efficiency of motion. At first, Sally took Jessie at his word that the study was to see if she could improve her time and therefore get more work completed faster. It wasn’t until she overheard him telling someone else that he was thinking of getting a robot to do her job that she lost faith in him and the company. Shouldn’t they be telling her about this possible change? Is it fair to just announce the change one day and her being out of a job the next? Jessie just lied to her. Not sure of what she heard. Sally consulted some of the other production workers who performed different jobs. That said, there had been rumors. but they knew Dwight and Ike would never do something that drastic without consulting with them.  Sally just wasn’t sure. Worse yet, Jessie made her write down all the data for the study and questioned her if she left some numbers blank. She lost track often and her work began to suffer. Jessie began to come down hard on her and finally put her on probation. When this happened, she finally confided in others only to find that several felt they were not trusted by Jessie. That he seemed to question what they were doing. Only a week after Dwight began to investigate Sally’s unhappiness did things come to a head in the department. Jessie had a team meeting to address the reasons why production rates had dropped. He talked for a half-hour. He asked for people’s opinions and no one would reply. One person asked permission to speak but asked only if the study would take much longer. Finally, Jessie dismissed the team. Jessie did not understand that when he first arrived everyone was happy and helpful. Had he not always been straight with them?  Why was everyone so unhappy now? Jessie finally saw that he had a problem but was not quite sure what it was.
Dwight approached Jessie a few days after the meeting and asked him if the rumors he heard about using robots to replace some of the production workers were true. The nickel dropped, Jessie finally knew what was wrong. Do You?Skill #3: Building trust in team relationships both locally and at a distance.
In week one Dwight and Ike explained that EC had expanded into the Asian Market. They are concerned that the distributors could function better if they had better teamwork with the groups in Japan and Korea. The current EC teams report that the Asian teams seem quiet when they meet and are not as quick to respond to the new plans. Personal interaction (chit chat) is at a minimum and seems to be one-sided. The EC teams are getting stressed out because they are always taking calls either late at night or early in the morning to catch the Japanese/South Korean working hours.   Overall, they just feel that they are being tested and are coming up wanting.
Creating Trust in a virtual team, especially those with members from abroad, is particularly hard. How can you help the EC team be successful? Show Dwight how you would set up a new international team and how you might help the existing teams.

• Scenario one should seek to comment on the following points: Identify and explain the trust issues that Jessie has with his direct report. How did he create this problem? What can he do to correct the issue?
• Scenario two should explain to Dwight how to set up a successful team, establish trust in a culturally diverse environment. It should also include ways now to bolster the trust in the existing teams. Explain the influence of cultural IQ in virtual meetings and how and why it can cloud success. In the discussion of the Asian teams, research the cultural differences in creating trust relationships between Americans and the Japanese and South Koreans.
• Explain specifically how this relates to the experience of the EC team members. Identifying and describing the steps that should be taken by team members to make the virtual experience work. This template should be something that all teams can follow in the future. Be sure to include a step for cultural diversity if these virtual meetings are cross-cultural. Explain why and how these steps will create trust in the relationship.
• Both scenarios should include a detailed discussion of the communications issues present and how best to address them for better relationships in the future.
• You must use course material to support your responses and APA in-text citations with a reference list.

Please use the required reading material to support short answers.

For this essay, you will explore the key concepts of ethnocentrism and cultural relativism and relate them to events in the real world.
Instructions:

1. Find a NEWS article that addresses an example of ethnocentrism. (A news article is an article from a media source like a newspaper or magazine tsuch as the New York Times, FOX, The Washington Post, VICE, etc. that addresses a current event. It does not include sources like Wikipedia, eHow, dictionaries, academic journals, or other information websites.)
2. Write a 300 word essay that answers the following questions:
   1. What is culture?
   2. What are ethnocentrism and cultural relativism?
   3. How does the artlcle you chose exemplify the ethnocentrism at work in the world today, and how would a cultural relativistic approach improve the situation?
3. Discuss with details and tie the findings in the article to what you learned.
4. Your essay should be:
   • A total of 300 words or more.
   • Written in complete sentences and paragraphs.
   • Proof-read for clarity.
   • Use factual information from the textbook and/or appropriate articles and websites.
   • Original work and will be checked for plagiarism.
   • Cite your sources – type references according to the APA Style Guide.
     • Essays without proper citations and/or large portions copied from other sources will receive a zero.