ACT 480 CSU Global The Practical Application of Accounting XBRL Capstone
I need all workpaper, word document, & presentation slides done by 2pm MST on Wednesday the 5th.
Please review all required documents and make sure you have everything needed ASAP as professor already expects that I have everything needed to complete this assignment.
APA 7 is required for all sources used and cited.
Please note 5 – 6 credible sources need to be noted on reference page as well as cited.
Please draft detailed speaking notes for slides and cite all sources there as I will be reading this off when I record actual presentation via Zoom.
Please review all attached details for Lab instruction, as well as grading rubric and requirements noted.
Option #2: Financial Analytics: Financial Statement Analysis
You are required to complete both parts A and B.
Part A:
Complete Lab 8-3 Analyze Financial Statement Ratios (pp. 352 – 354) in your textbook.
Part B:
- Your analysis should be written as an essay and should include the following:
- Introduction
- Analysis: Headings – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 (i.e., Part 1: Identify the Questions) – headings are shown in the Lab.
- Global Implications – Note any relevant ethical and regulatory trends affecting domestic and international accounting in the global business environment.
- Conclusion.
- Submit your analysis as a Word document and submit any additional requirements noted in the Lab (i.e., Excel files, tables, etc.).
- Present your findings to the Board of Directors. Using Zoom, create and record a presentation of your analysis (4 slides).
Your paper should be 4-6 pages in length (excluding cover and references pages and Lab requirements) and conform to the guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Include your four-slide presentation. Include at least five scholarly references in addition to the course textbook (six total minimum sources). The CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these references.
Rubric
ACT 480 Mod 8 PP
ACT 480 Mod 8 PP
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
| 70 to >56.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
56 to >42.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
42 to >28.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
28 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
70 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 55 to >44.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of XXX; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
44 to >33.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
33 to >22.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
22 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
55 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
| 50 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
40 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
30 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
20 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
|
50 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
|
| 50 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in Research and Business Intelligence.
|
40 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
30 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
20 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
|
|
50 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
|
| 20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates five to six credible sources.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates three to four credible sources.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates one to two credible sources.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates no credible sources.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
|
| 20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
|
| 20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; follows proper format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and does not follow proper format. Does not conform to project requirements.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
|
| 20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.
|
| 20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
Total Points: 325
|
